Still here…

I’ve just been busy. It may be another week or two before I really have a chance to get anything new up. Sorry about the lack of content.

END OF LINE

Still here, just busy

Update : Two by two, hands of blue. :-\
—–

I know I haven’t posted anything for, like, forever (in blog terms at least). Sorry about that, life’s just been keeping me busy lately.

Unfortunately, and despite my best attempts to convince my family to drive, I have to fly halfway across the country for a funeral. Let’s just say that I am not looking forward to the TSA experience (the only reason I wanted to drive the ~700 miles each way). We’ll see how things work out.

I expect to be back early next week.

END OF LINE

Still alive

I’m still around, and I’m not giving up on the blogging thing. I’ve just been busy with Real Life™  lately, and nothing has caught my interest enough for me to take the extra time to bang out a post.

Don’t worry, I’ll be back.

END OF LINE

Welcome Breitbart readers!

Holy cow, that caught me by surprise! Normally I get anywhere from 20 to 40 pageviews a day. Yesterday I hit 637, and today I’m already at 277! Most of those seem to be referred from this article at Breitbart.com, according to WordPress’s stats. (Would this be called a Breitbartalanche?)

I hope you enjoy my myriad musings and random ramblings!

END OF LINE

Musical Interlude

Not feeling bloggy lately, so here’s a little music for you instead.

Enjoy.

END OF LINE

Blogroll update – 2012-03-09

FreeThinker has been added to the blogroll. Enjoy!

END OF LINE

The Health Insurance Birth Control Debate…

And a good proposal for a solution by Jennifer.

(Also, I’ve added In Jennifer’s Head to the blogroll. Welcome aboard!)

END OF LINE

A Gunblogger’s real life DGU, thankfully with no shots fired

Gunblogger RedeemedBoyd (now added to the blogroll) has done us the honor of recounting his recent Defensive Gun Use (DGU). This occurred only a few days ago, so his recollections are still fresh. Go, read. I have a few comments for when you’re done.

Got it? Good. Let’s look at a couple of things.

Others, including RedeemedBoyd, have already pointed out how it was his situational awareness that allowed him to stop the attack before it even occurred, but I really want to emphasize one significant point: nothing the attackers did in preparation for this ambush appeared unusual or out of place for the location.

Think about that. Every piece of their setup looked innocuous, and nothing set of his alarms until they actually made their approach. Even then, it was only because he saw motion in his mirror from the corner of his eye that he was able to focus on their approach and see the warning signs in time to take the precaution of drawing his pistol. Had he not seen that motion, he might not have had time to notice that they were trying to hide what they were carrying. Had he not been paying attention to his surroundings, he might not have noticed them at all until they were right next to his windows, by which point he probably would not have gotten out of the encounter without at least two broken windows, and probably not without some kind of injury. He would have been trying to draw his pistol while somebody was either grabbing him or striking him with an ASP baton – and at the same time as the other attacker would likely have been trying to grab his daughter on the other side.

Another question to ask, and the answer to this one is pretty chilling: What was their objective? This seems to be an odd and ineffective setup for a simple robbery. If it was a carjacking, they probably wouldn’t have been as ready to break the windows – I don’t know what part of the country he’s in, but this is still January, and even if it is unseasonably warm there it’s still probably cool enough that driving without windows would be unpleasant. Also, whether it was a carjacking or simple theft to strip and sell the car, the getaway car seems to be extraneous – they could drive the stolen car just as easily.

The biggest conclusion that looms in my mind is that this was intended as a physical assault, perhaps as part of an initiation. And that could have been very bad news. Hopefully, if that were the case, they would have left his daughter alone. Hopefully.

Fortunately, RedeemedBoyd had three things working in his favour. 1) He was aware of his surroundings, 2) He was armed, and 3) He kept the presence of mind to react appropriately and prepare as soon as he recognized the possibility of danger.

The final thing to take from this is that the attackers were cowards. As soon as they realized their intended prey was armed, they panicked and ran like scared little jackrabbits with a pack of hounds after them. No attempts to bluster or intimidate, or even to carry out their attack at all. They just ran.

Remember that. Most violent predators are cowards. They deliberately choose the weak, helpless, or unaware – those who are least likely to be able to fight back effectively – as their victims, and they frequently run when confronted. But it’s also very important to remember that they don’t always run. Don’t expect your gun to be a magic talisman that frightens away your attackers as soon as it is drawn without you ever having to pull the trigger. Be prepared to shoot if you have to.

And always carry your gun. It’s a lighter burden than regret.

END OF LINE

Out training

I’m still around. I’m out of town at a statewide EMS training conference, right now. Interestingly, I walked by one of the Occupy [$SOMEPLACE] locations as the police were shutting down the camp (though I didn’t realize that was what was happening at the time). There was a 3 or 4 to 1 ratio of cops to protesters.

I’ll have more later (it could be a day or two or three). Right now there’s a group getting together for dinner, and I’m hungry.

END OF LINE

Fourth Amendment? What Fourth Amendment?

Cemetery, of Cemetery’s Gun Blob*, recently had his car searched by the police based on a police dog “alerting” to a scent.

Bring on the dog then I said, was told ok, but if the dog gets to happy, it’s too bad about any potential damage.

Nice right? Do what we want or your car gets trashed basically.

Out comes the dog, a male German Shepard, who don’t give two shits about my car. And anybody with a brain could tell he was just happy to get some fresh air and chase some squirrels.

So of course the LEO says the dog likes my car, and now comes the fun.

They didn’t give two shits about the guns, they just wanted to search for narcotics.

This reminded me of a damning article I found a couple of months ago regarding drug dogs giving false positives.

The results? Dog/handler teams correctly completed a search with no alerts in just 21 of the 144 walk-throughs. The other 123 searches produced an astounding 225 alerts, every one of them false. Even more interesting, [the search points designed to trick the handlers (marked by the red slips of paper) ]were about twice as likely to trigger false alerts as the search points designed to trick the dogs (by luring them with sausages).

emphasis mine – Jake

That study got false positives in 84% of the searches. What makes this truly disturbing is that the use of drug dogs to get probable cause for a warrantless search has become routine across the country, and the courts in most states have ruled that this is acceptable. We can see from the results of this study that the dogs are picking up on the handler’s expectations or desires and giving false alerts

In other words, the dogs are not reliable for what they are being used for, and a dog’s alert should not be sufficient on its own to constitute probable cause for a search. This practice needs to be ended, now.

END OF LINE

[Source: Post at Cemetery's Gun Blob, retrieved 11/3/11]
[Source: Article from The Economist, published 2/15/11, retrieved 11/3/11]

(h/t Weer’d Beard)

*Added to the blogroll as of today.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: